|
|
Editorial: State Bar Findings Should Warrant
Prosecutor's Disbarment
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n571/a04.html
Newshawk: Alan Bean
Pubdate: Mon, 12 Apr 2004
Source: Austin American-Statesman (TX)
Copyright: 2004 Austin American-Statesman
Contact: letters@statesman.com
Website: http://www.austin360.com/statesman/editions/today/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/32
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/tulia.htm
(Tulia, Texas)
STATE BAR FINDINGS SHOULD WARRANT PROSECUTOR'S
DISBARMENT
Justice arrived slowly for the 38 Tulia residents wrongly
convicted of drug felonies on the now discredited testimony of a
rogue undercover law enforcement officer. Last week, the
State Bar of Texas took steps to restore integrity to a system
that broke down on several levels.
The multimillion-dollar financial settlements by several cities
and counties, including Amarillo, certainly will help the Tulia
residents rebuild their lives and families shattered by the bogus
drug stings.
But we can expect more people to be wrongly convicted and
imprisoned in Texas jails as long as cheating prosecutors are
allowed to bend or break the rules with impunity. That's why
the state bar's actions are welcome. The officer, Tom
Coleman, faces felony perjury charges for his role in the
convictions that thrust Tulia and Texas justice into a national
spotlight.
We'll await the judgment of a court to determine what happens to
Coleman. He now appears to have targeted Tulia residents
because their "real" crime was being poor and black.
Most of the 38 people who were ultimately convicted were African
Americans on the white officer's say-so.
As prosecutor in the Tulia case, Terry McEachern had a duty to
seek justice -- not just convictions. Instead, McEachern
vigorously pursued convictions he almost certainly knew were based
on disreputable and questionable testimony and evidence. To
win, McEachern cheated, the state bar asserts.
The extent of McEachern's alleged misconduct and deception is
outlined in the legal brief filed by the state bar this week.
It states that McEachern knew Coleman had been charged with theft
and abuse of office while working as a peace officer in Cochran
County before coming to Tulia, in Swisher County, but failed to
disclose those details to defense attorneys, who had requested
background information on Coleman.
The brief further states that McEachern lied to the trial court,
representing that Coleman didn't have a criminal history, though
he knew otherwise. Unbelievably, Coleman had been arrested
as he carried out his drug sting in Tulia for the charges he faced
in Cochran County for which he made restitution by paying $7,000.
Yes, McEachern knew this, according to the bar's petition, but
permitted Coleman's supervisor to testify that Coleman was an
exceptional officer with no problems.
The bar's role as a check and balance on prosecutors has gained
momentum and importance as the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has
pushed back from its responsibility to ensure that defendants get
a fair trial. In recent months, the U.S. Supreme Court
has rebuked Texas and reversed cases because of cheating
prosecutors who have won convictions by violating defendants'
civil rights. The bar should turn its attention to
prosecutors in the Delma Banks case, the Texarkana man whose death
sentence recently was reversed because the district attorney's
office in Bowie County suppressed evidence and permitted key
witnesses to give false testimony.
McEachern's case now moves to a district court. If a judge
or jury sustains the bar's allegation, punishment ranges from a
public reprimand to disbarment.
Disregarding the truth, McEachern played havoc with lives that
didn't belong to him and with taxpayer money that wasn't his.
If sustained, the allegations are serious enough to warrant
disbarment.
|
|
 

|