|
|
Drug Law Has Unintended Effect On Would-be College Students
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n571/a06.html
Newshawk: chip
Pubdate: Sun, 11 Apr 2004
Source: Kansas City Star (MO)
Copyright: 2004 The Kansas City Star
Contact: letters@kcstar.com
Website: http://www.kcstar.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/221
Author: The New York Times
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hea.htm
(Higher Education Act)
DRUG LAW HAS UNINTENDED EFFECT ON WOULD-BE
COLLEGE STUDENTS
NEW YORK - She was thrown out of her home by age 13, spent her
teenage years sleeping on subway trains and rotting piers, and
still managed to get her general equivalency diploma.
So Laura Melendez figured she had kept her nose pretty clean.
Sure, there had been a few arrests for smoking marijuana, but
after an entire adolescence spent on the streets, with far more
visits by the police than by her parents, what did those offenses
really amount to?
"It means I'll be denied an education," said Melendez,
now 22 and applying to college.
If Melendez had been an armed robber, a rapist or even a murderer,
she would not be in the same predicament. Once out of
prison, she would have been entitled to government grants and
loans, no questions asked.
But under a contentious provision of federal law, tens of
thousands of would-be college students have been denied financial
aid because of drug offenses, even though the crimes may had been
committed long ago and the sentences already served.
"It is absurd on the face of it," said Rep. Mark
Souder, an Indiana Republican.
Souder, who wrote the law, says the Clinton and Bush
administrations have turned it on its head, taking a penalty meant
to discourage current students from experimenting with drugs and
using it to punish people trying to get their lives back on track.
"I am an evangelic Christian who believes in repentance, so
why would I have supported that?" he said. "Why
would any of us in Congress?"
The aid prohibition has been a sore point since its enactment in
1998, inciting debate and recriminations all around. Members
of Congress have accused the Clinton and Bush administrations of
distorting the law's intent.
The Department of Education has fired back, saying that Congress
handed it a vague and sloppy law - one referring simply to "a
student who has been convicted" of a drug offense - that the
department is faithfully enforcing.
Some members of Congress say they are pushing to rewrite the law.
For the first time since the prohibition took effect, the
president's budget includes a commitment to revise it - not to
throw it out, but to narrow its scope so that students like
Melendez would get a second chance.
"It would really take a lot off my mind," she said.
"I need to go to school. I can't just leave it like
this."
|
|
 

|