|
|
Families Press for Sentencing Reform
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n580/a09.html
Newshawk: chip
Pubdate: Wed, 14 Apr 2004
Source: Charlotte Observer (NC)
Copyright: 2004 The Charlotte Observer
Contact: opinion@charlotteobserver.com
Website: http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/78
Author: Emery P. Dalesio, Associated Press
Cited: Families Against Mandatory Minimums http://www.famm.org/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prison.htm
(Incarceration)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?199
(Mandatory Minimum Sentencing)
FAMILIES PRESS FOR SENTENCING REFORM
Group Says Changes Could Save Money, Reduce Need for Prisons
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK - From age 14, Hayne and Patricia
Plattenburg's daughter used drugs and skipped school. The
Waxhaw couple put Jennifer into a treatment program, but she
graduated to crack cocaine and forged checks for the cash to
support her habit.
When Jennifer Bigham tried for a fourth time to pass a fake check,
prosecutors last year charged her as a habitual felon, under a law
that brings stiff mandatory sentences.
The Plattenburgs' daughter, 25, is now serving up to almost eight
years in prison -- a term longer than some kidnappers receive.
"She wasn't there for what she did. She was given time
because of a mandatory law," Patricia Plattenburg said
Tuesday. "Jennifer is a good girl who had developed a
bad drug addiction."
The Plattenburgs don't dispute that their daughter should be
punished, but they believe her sentence is out of proportion to
her crimes -- a view shared by advocates for sentencing reform who
met Tuesday.
Reform advocates believe the cash-strapped state should not spend
hundreds of millions of dollars building more prisons to
accommodate a growing population of inmates, but should tweak the
laws to save money, still ensuring that violent criminals remain
locked up for a long time.
The N.C. chapter of Families Against Mandatory Minimums and
other groups are backing reforms proposed by a state panel that
has researched the effect of laws on the prison system. If
enacted, it is estimated that the reforms proposed by the
Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission could save the state
from having to build at least five new prisons over the next
decade.
"Money going into prisons and operating prisons takes money
away from education," said state Rep. Beverly Earle,
D-Mecklenburg, a member of the House budget-writing committee.
It has been two years since the commission first presented its
reforms, but lawmakers have made none of the suggested changes.
Last year, they approved plans to build three more prisons for
$234 million.
The commission's proposals include cutting the terms for most
habitual felons, who are now sentenced in a range reserved for
violent crimes. That would put criminals who commit repeated
crimes in prison for an average of more than 5 years, rather than
the current average sentence of nearly 9 years, advocates said.
The proposals wouldn't change punishment for the 13 percent of
crimes by repeat offenders that involve violence, but the
remainder that primarily involve drugs, theft or property crimes.
Prosecutors and law enforcement officials last year opposed
legislation to change the habitual felon law, which they see as an
effective deterrent to crime. Their opposition is likely to
continue, said Rep. Joe Kiser, R-Lincoln, a former member of
the sentencing commission and former Lincoln County sheriff.
Decisionmakers revised North Carolina's sentencing system a decade
ago to ensure violent criminals serve their entire sentence and
that misdemeanor crimes didn't result in a prison sentence.
But lawmakers knew then that a growing population would probably
result in the need to build prisons, he said.
"Structured sentencing was designed to keep people who commit
serious crimes and commit crimes often to stay locked up for a
long time," said Kiser, who was no longer a member of the
sentencing commission when it made its reform proposals.
"It's worked beautifully in North Carolina."
Other commission recommendations included cutting three months off
the maximum sentence for violent criminals other than murders and
adding three months to their post-release supervision.
Sentencing reformers plan to hold a large-scale rally two weeks
after the General Assembly comes back into session next month.
Kiser said they're likely to meet the same skepticism they did
last year.
"I haven't got any feeling that anything has changed. I
don't think that anyone wants to be soft on crime, particularly in
an election year," he said.
While Kiser said he sympathizes with the Plattenburgs, their
daughter is another story.
"I feel sorry for anyone that has to go to prison," he
said. "But if you continue to do the crime you have to
be able to do the time."
|
|
 

|